As departments find deeper ways to collaborate, the bill of materials (BOM) now proves its value more than it may have once appeared. It gives engineers, procurement managers, logistics operators, and manufacturing specialists a blueprint for lean and efficient printed-circuit-board (PCB) production.
A BOM is more than a mere documentation of a product’s components, though, as it also holds vital information on different product functions; the individual subassemblies within a finished electronic device and the impacts of a single part on multiple design levels. Consider a multi-level BOM as the "family tree" of components in a device, a hierarchy of micro-projects involved in delivering the finished goods.
This article will educate you and your team on the composition and benefits of a multi-level BOM, and the must-have software to manage a complex supply chain of parts and the effects they have at all stages of the design and production process.
A multi-level BOM, also referred to as an indented BOM, incorporates a web of components found in products and their subassemblies. It is the hierarchical structure of parts within finished goods; a representation of an electronic product in layer list format that is often designed for use by procurement professionals.
Until now, companies have leveraged BOMs to acquire components at the best prices and ensure product requirements are met. Now there are more functions in the electronics world for this documentation. Now, electronics makers are uncovering more valuable functions, including the latest visibility into the component lifecycle and integration with third parties to rapidly source alternative parts.
In the event of component obsolescence or a defect in a known batch of products or subassemblies, there is seldom a need to break down the entire product. With this in mind, there is inherent value in pinpointing the immediate connections to that particular component, which leaves little room to speculate where a fault may arise.
For instance, say a product returns a fault, perhaps a component local to a decoupling capacitor along a power rail. Knowing where the fault occurs and aligning this visibility with a multi-level BOM can help pinpoint the section or group of connections in which the fault lies.
Electronic devices contain a series of components which, for assembly, have BOMs of their own. While a PCB has a list of components, individual mounted parts (i.e. resistors, transistors, and integrated circuits) hold their own parts lists. This is information essential to subassembly procurement and pieces that are susceptible to obsolescence, defects, or shortages.
In order to understand the full benefit of BOM management at such a granular level, it is, firstly, worth recognizing the myriad of factors that make up risk. As procurement departments become more invested in design and build functions, the digital solutions available to all stakeholders are developing rapidly.
The lack of digital adoption in this sphere (on average, 61% of procurement leaders are yet to experiment with more intelligent tools) is crucial to the next point, which is choosing the right BOM management tool for your organization. Oftentimes we hear a lot of businesses are yet to branch out and leverage more dynamic tools that can significantly reduce the friction in the design-procurement processes.
Many organizations still suffer in silos, which leaves them short of many benefits of interdepartmental collaboration. This can be a result of the time and monetary cost associated with digitalization, and they are yet to realize the returns that technology brings. It is important to note that many of the leading global manufacturers are shifting their efforts to become more proactive, thus requiring greater visibility from the supply chain and in further advance of production launches.
There are a number of different ways to approach BOM management, but each has its own benefits depending on the user’s readiness and proficiency with managed digital BOMs. The factors that impact how effective a solution can be are:
Ultimately, the more a BOM solution can integrate all necessary data streams and automate changes across different languages, the more useful it becomes to all types of stakeholders. Procurement managers have their own systems to incorporate, as do mechanical and electrical engineers.
There are fewer and fewer use-cases for automated spreadsheets (purpose-built or configurable solutions). Yet, 50% of organizations in the Supplyframe survey still rely on them. Only 25% of North American manufacturers have stepped away from spreadsheets and other ad hoc solutions to immediate sourcing conditions.
While this entry-level BOM management system works well for data entry, multi-level management is stunted by outdated information. The moment a spreadsheet is created, it seldom flexes to achieve greater accuracy and efficiency.
Standalone solutions with cloud access are capable of integrating CAD and EDA systems. Cloud-based solutions are more flexible to changing needs of suppliers and provide greater collaboration benefits. This kind of tool can be successful, but requires good connectors and APIs to integrate other platforms and systems.
APIs are core BOM engines that can be customized to meet the needs of the business. This offers greater benefits for expansion, such as the co-use of custom tooling, and aids a future outlook. The only downside is exactly that - futureproofing. While incredibly flexible to business needs, API-based BOM solutions require more engineering in order to achieve the desired outcomes year after year.
A costly solution, but PLM works as an integral part of supply chain systems. Managing multi-level BOMs requires a myriad of insights from stakeholders, and integrating supply chain management allows for greater visibility of version changes.
ERP can be tied into procurement functions exceptionally well. BOM management is embedded into procurement and manufacturing planning systems to ensure factors such as inventory, cost rollout, and scheduling are accounted for. ERP does lack electronics-specific integrations, though, and rarely integrates component lifecycle, CAD, and alternate parts data.
A purpose-built solution is not always bespoke. CAD-integrated BOM management allows greater cohesion between electronics engineers and their procurement managers. For example, Altium Develop allows both parties to view product designs in agnostics formats. Procurement teams can pinpoint potential supply issues through a multi-level BOMs while engineers target physical defects with insight into the parts and their sourcing information.
The most effective way to design and source collaboratively can be found by answering the following questions:
The answers, and the inevitable need to integrate both design and procurement workflows, point to a more intuitive solution: a collaborative, CAD-integrated workspace that enables clear cross-department communication.
Including Altium Designer and Altium 365, Altium Develop is the package for teams to build better and more efficiently. The solution aids co-creation in real time and translates design and procurement contexts so insights are visible to everyone.
With Altium Develop, there is little need to worry about data. Meanwhile, creating version control and product history has never been easier. This is a core step to breaking down silos and ensuring no changes slip through the cracks.
Whether you need to build reliable power electronics or advanced digital systems, Altium Develop unites every discipline into one collaborative force. Free from silos. Free from limits. It’s where engineers, designers, and innovators work as one to co-create without constraints. Experience Altium Develop today!