Newly Updated US Export Rules to China Target AI Chips

Adam J. Fleischer
|  Created: May 9, 2024  |  Updated: May 16, 2024
Newly Updated US Export Rules to China Target AI Chips

Amidst an escalating tech rivalry between the United States and China, the semiconductor industry finds itself in the middle of the confrontation. The recent update to US export controls targeting AI chips and chipmaking tools destined for China has introduced a new chapter in this technological tug-of-war. While aimed at curtailing China's scientific and military advancement, these measures have broad ramifications for the electronic component industry, encompassing business strategies, global supply chains and the fabric of international tech relations.

Overview of the New Export Rules

In an unprecedented move, the Biden Administration revised the US export controls last October to significantly restrict China's access to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips and the technology used in their creation. The sweeping restrictions, extending even to laptops embedded with such chips, became effective on April 4, 2024, and are detailed in a comprehensive 166-page document. These controls demonstrate Washington's resolve to increase strategic pressure on Beijing amidst growing national security concerns​​.

Chip Leaders Caught in the Crosshairs

Among the technologies caught in this regulatory net are some of the industry's most advanced AI chips, including those produced by leading manufacturers like Nvidia and AMD. Nvidia's A100 Tensor Core GPU  and H100 Tensor Core GPU, designed for complex AI and machine learning tasks, and AMD's Instinct™ MI200 Series Accelerators, stand at the forefront of current AI technology and can no longer be exported to China. These chips, distinguished for their high computational power and efficiency, are crucial not just for AI applications but for tasks ranging from data analytics to cloud computing and autonomous driving.

The Rationale Behind Tightened Controls

The US's tightening of export controls is propelled by two objectives: safeguarding national security and preserving America’s technological leadership. The legislative underpinning of this strategy, the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, signaled a serious commitment to strengthen the US semiconductor industry and thwart China's potential to harness advanced semiconductor technologies for military enhancement. The CHIPS Act bolsters research and development within the US and signals American intent to sustain the nation's pole position in the global technological race​​. 

How Leading US Firms Adapted to 2022 Controls

Nvidia adapted to the US regulations by altering the products supplied to the Chinese market, with new offerings designed to comply with the export rules. These products have reduced processing capabilities, specifically capping certain performance metrics like the speed of AI calculations, to meet the regulatory requirements. Despite adapting to the new controls, Nvidia has said the export restrictions could cost the company hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.

an illustration of an AI chip
A recent update to US export controls has targeted AI chips

Similarly, AMD adjusted its product offerings in response to the export restrictions. The company has continued to sell products in China but has adjusted the technical capabilities of products to align with new requirements.

Background and Impact on China's Semiconductor Ecosystem

The repercussions of the US's export controls on China's semiconductor landscape have been significant. Tech giants within China, previously reliant on US semiconductor innovations for development and expansion, now confront substantial operational and strategic challenges. After the CHIPS Act was enacted in 2022, Yangtze Memory Technologies, a leading player in China's semiconductor arena, lost its business with Apple. Similarly, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), China’s largest state-backed chipmaker, faced hurdles accessing critical equipment that slowed down its expansion plans​.

Since then, China has been working to become more self-sufficient in the semiconductor industry, with some recent success. Due to US sanctions, most new Chinese investments have focused on mature semiconductors rather than cutting-edge tech. Because of this, the US chip sanctions might be backfiring in some ways, as China's output of legacy semiconductors grew by a stunning 40% in the first quarter of 2024. This massive surge in production suggests US export controls could unintentionally lead to China becoming a global leader in legacy chip production.

Recent Developments Q1 2024

Despite expectations that Chinese firms would be unable to make cutting-edge chips, SMIC appears to have been manufacturing advanced chips in the first quarter of 2024, somehow defying the sanctions designed to slow their progress.

Meanwhile, some American manufacturers have hit roadblocks in adapting to the restrictions, as recently exemplified by AMD failing to get a made-for-China AI chip approved by U.S. regulators in March of 2024 and will need to apply for an export license.

Industry Reactions and Strategic Adaptations

The imposition of the new AI chip export rules has elicited a spectrum of responses from the semiconductor industry. On the one hand, American tech giants have been recalibrating their strategies to align with the regulatory landscape, navigating compliance challenges while striving to minimize disruptions to their global operations. 

On the other hand, Chinese firms are exploring innovative approaches to circumvent these restrictions, ranging from accelerating the development of indigenous technologies to forging new international alliances. These maneuvers reflect a broader industry trend towards resilience and adaptability in the face of geopolitical pressures.

A tech factory in Sichuan
Export controls may stimulate China's home production abilties

The updated export controls have consequential geopolitical ramifications. As the technological divide between the US and China deepens, further escalation in trade tensions and retaliatory measures seems likely. With its sophisticated and globally dispersed supply chains, the semiconductor industry finds itself at the epicenter of this geopolitical contest, tasked with managing increasing business uncertainty and complexity.

Forward-Looking Perspectives

The path forward for the global semiconductor industry will be full of challenges. As the US and China continue this technological competition, the prospect of a "technological decoupling" becomes increasingly plausible. Industry stakeholders have taken note and are reevaluating their strategies, preparing for a potentially segmented global tech ecosystem.

One scenario involves a bifurcation of the global tech landscape, where parallel ecosystems emerge, each anchored by the technological standards and regulations of the US and China, respectively. This scenario could increase costs and complexity for industry players forced to navigate dual systems. 

A conceptual globe surrounding microchips
These controls could have radical effects on the global semiconductor industry

Another potential scenario is an increasing push towards self-reliance from China, accelerating its quest for semiconductor self-sufficiency. Such a drive might reshape global supply chains and spur innovation as countries and companies strive to develop native onshore capabilities and alternative sources for critical technologies. 

Alternatively, we could enter a period of increased collaboration and negotiation that could mitigate tensions and establish new norms for technological exchange and cooperation. This optimistic scenario would require substantial diplomatic efforts but could pave the way for a more stable and interconnected global tech landscape. 

Navigating the Silicon Curtain

The recent tightening of US export controls on AI chips to China represents a pivotal time for the semiconductor industry, illustrating the intricate interplay between technology, national security and global geopolitics. For professionals across the electronics sector, this shifting landscape demands a proactive approach characterized by strategic foresight, adaptability and an ongoing commitment to innovation. As the industry advances, mastering the complexities of this new regulatory environment will be essential for capitalizing on emerging opportunities and tackling the challenges of an increasingly dynamic global arena.

 

About Author

About Author

Adam Fleischer is a principal at etimes.com, a technology marketing consultancy that works with technology leaders – like Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Arrow Electronics – as well as with small high-growth companies. Adam has been a tech geek since programming a lunar landing game on a DEC mainframe as a kid. Adam founded and for a decade acted as CEO of E.ON Interactive, a boutique award-winning creative interactive design agency in Silicon Valley. He holds an MBA from Stanford’s Graduate School of Business and a B.A. from Columbia University. Adam also has a background in performance magic and is currently on the executive team organizing an international conference on how performance magic inspires creativity in technology and science. 

Related Resources

Back to Home
Thank you, you are now subscribed to updates.