Can You Design a Rotation-Proof Connector Pinout?

Zachariah Peterson
|  Created: September 21, 2021
Rotation-proof pin header

Sometimes, you need to make a board-to-board connection, use a custom cable, or daisy chained arrangement of multiple boards. While working on a recent client project, we were dealing with daisy chaining boards across a large manifold, and we needed to make sure that, no matter how the installers arranged their ribbon cable, it would always plug in the right way. Sometimes, you need to foolproof a design to make sure that simple mistakes don’t cripple an entire system. Rotation-proof headers are a great solution for ensuring your connection will always be routed correctly.

Not all connectors will be amenable to a rotation-proof pinout. However, in general, if you have an unshrouded pion header, and you want to ensure it can provide an accurate connection in any orientation, consider these tips for designing your own rotation-proof pinouts.

Rotation-Proof Pinouts

When should you use a rotation-proof pinout? There are some specific types of connectors and different situations where you might want to use this type of pinout design. Some of these situations include:

  • Un-keyed pinouts: Rotation-proof pinouts only apply when the connector is un-keyed, meaning there is no keying mechanism built into the shroud.
  • Linear pinouts: Most pinouts you’ll need to make rotation-proof are linear pinouts, although they may have multiple columns.
  • Daisy-chained boards: If you’re daisy chaining boards with cables in a linear topology, you’ll definitely want to make sure the pinout for the connector is rotation-proof. This will also make the connector translation-proof.

There are other situations where a rotation-proof pinout for a connector might be needed, and sometimes it’s hard to predict every situation where this will be needed.

Rotation-proof pinout design starts with schematic capture and requires a schematic symbol to define your connections. When you’re working in the schematic, it’s best to place pins in the symbol that match the arrangement on the footprint, that way you can clearly see how you’ll need to arrange the pins to ensure a rotation-proof design. For pin headers or mezzanine connectors, you’ll have different configurations with 1-row pinouts vs. multi-row pinouts.

Single-Row Pinouts

The simplest case of a rotation-proof pinout is to place a single-row pinout and just cut it in half (see below). The pinout on the top half can mirror the bottom half, and this will ensure the header is rotation-proof. The benefit here is definitely in terms of daisy chaining: as long as the component has no keying, then you can daisy chain boards with a flat cable or ribbon cable, and you won’t have to worry about bunching the cable while trying to match pinouts.

Rotation-proof pin header 1-row
Example rotation-proof pinout with a single row using Phoenix Contact 1933260.

In the above example, you’re free to route power, ground, and signals through multiple pins, but you’ll need to enforce the mirroring shown above if you want to keep the pinout rotation-proof. Interleaving power and ground in this type of pin out (such as on each even pin) will provide high isolation against external noise while also giving you rotation-proof connectivity. However, the downside is the large number of pins that gets used to ensure the connection is rotation-proof.

Double-Column Pinouts

Let’s suppose that, instead of a linear pinout as shown above, what if we use a 2-row pinout? Double-row pinouts are only slightly more complex in that we need to enforce rotation-proof conditions across the connector (between columns) and along the connector (between columns). Here, you have to cut the pinout into quadrants, where each quadrant is then mirrored in the opposite corner. An example of this type of rotation-proof pinout is shown below.

Rotation-proof pin header 2-row
Example rotation-proof pinout with two columns using TE Connectivity 5-146256-5.

Here we have a similar problem: the total number of available connections is reduced from 10 to 5; this is because each pin on the left side of the pinout requires a mirror on the right side. You could argue that the 2-row example is more complex, but it’s also a better option in terms of board space as this will be more compact.

Pinouts With 3 or More Columns

Once you’re dealing with 3 columns or more, you’re basically combining single-row and double-row rotation-proof pinouts into a single symbol and footprint. Take a look at the example component below: this 24-pin header has two outside sets of pins that would always need to be mirrored. However, the inside set could be totally unassociated with the outside pins. In other words, the central column could have the mirroring enforced on a 1-column pinout. Another arrangement with this is to set the center column to match some of the pins along the edges.

Rotation-proof pin header 3-column
This 3-column connector (933824TS) could have an odd pinout, but it can be designed with enforced rotation proofing.

If you’re still unconvinced of the value of a rotation-proof connector pinout, all you need to do is look at the USB Type C plug for your mobile phone. The next time you need to make a rotation-proof pinout, use the best design tools in CircuitMaker, the easiest to use PCB design application. Users can also quickly create footprints for components and place required silkscreen markings. All CircuitMaker users also have access to a personal workspace on the Altium 365 platform, where they can upload and store design data in the cloud, and easily view projects via a web browser in a secure platform.

Start using CircuitMaker today and stay tuned for the new CircuitMaker Pro from Altium.

About Author

About Author

Zachariah Peterson has an extensive technical background in academia and industry. He currently provides research, design, and marketing services to companies in the electronics industry. Prior to working in the PCB industry, he taught at Portland State University and conducted research on random laser theory, materials, and stability. His background in scientific research spans topics in nanoparticle lasers, electronic and optoelectronic semiconductor devices, environmental sensors, and stochastics. His work has been published in over a dozen peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings, and he has written 2000+ technical articles on PCB design for a number of companies. He is a member of IEEE Photonics Society, IEEE Electronics Packaging Society, American Physical Society, and the Printed Circuit Engineering Association (PCEA). He previously served as a voting member on the INCITS Quantum Computing Technical Advisory Committee working on technical standards for quantum electronics, and he currently serves on the IEEE P3186 Working Group focused on Port Interface Representing Photonic Signals Using SPICE-class Circuit Simulators.

Related Resources

Related Technical Documentation

Back to Home
Thank you, you are now subscribed to updates.