What is the number one thing that can be done to ensure first pass success on your flex or rigid flex design? If the first word that comes to mind is COMMUNICATION I couldn’t agree more. Although the “basics” of flexible circuit design are not all that different than a rigid printed circuit board, the devil is in the details as they say. There are a number of subtle differences that will help ensure your design performs as needed: Routing traces perpendicular to the bend area, material selection, teardrops or anchoring spurs, stiffeners, to name a few. But fabricators all agree, the number one thing you can do to stack the deck for the best possible first pass yield and performance with a new flex or rigid flex design is to communicate openly and often with your fabricator during the design process. They have built hundreds or thousands of flex designs over time and happily offer the wisdom gained.
A direct telephone call or even email communication during the design process is well worth the effort. The next step in communication is a clear and specific fabrication drawing. This ensures accurate communication between the designer and vendor and significantly increases the chances for first pass success.
Fabricators often complain of errors in the fabrication drawing, some citing errors in up to 75% of the documentation packages they receive. At best, this results in time wasted during the tooling process, but at worst this could cause failure during installation and performance.
IPC standards define three classes of product. Understanding the requirements for manufacturing and inspection is critical and should be clearly stated in the fab drawing.
Fabricators need to understand what dimensions are critical and to what tolerance and PCG designers need to understand that certain tolerances will be different than when working with rigid printed circuit boards. Flex materials process differently than rigid materials.
Coverlay or cover coat serves as a flexible solder mask protecting the circuitry and defining pad openings. It is crucial to communicate the dielectric thickness and adhesive thickness required. This may vary depending on end application, number of flexing cycles that will be required and how this contributes to overall thickness. This is a good topic to discuss with your fabricator when reviewing materials and material availability.
When there are two or more flex cores, it is critical to specify the distance between those layers. These cores may be “bonded” or “unbonded” depending on performance requirements. When layers are bonded, it is also important to pay close attention to the overall thickness as those are built up. This can have a significant effect on flexibility. If using unbonded layers to increase the flexibility, it is critical that this is clearly communicated to the fabricator.
Example of bonded and unbonded layers provided by American Standard Circuits