Sometimes, it pays to go against the grain. FR4 substrates are by far the most popular option you'll find from fabricators, and each fabricator has their preferred supplier. However, you might want to pursue alternative PCB substrate materials for a multilayer board. Although there are multiple PCB laminate material manufacturers, the broad class of available substrates is somewhat limited.
If you need to build a device that is specialized for extreme environments, repeated thermal cycling, or high speed/RF devices, there are alternative materials for multilayer PCB substrates that may be a better choice. I'll show some examples in this article, although I'll do my best to be vendor-agnostic. What's more important is to understand the criteria for selecting an alternative to an FR4 substrate, and I'll provide the criteria that are important for various applications.
What we call "FR4" is actually a National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) designation for a class of materials; it is not one specific material or even one specific material composition. These PCB laminates comply with the UL94V-0 standard on inflammability of plastic materials.
While FR4 is by far the most popular substrate material for single and multilayer PCBs, it has its drawbacks:
For simple designs that run at low speed/low frequency, and that won't be running too hot or in an extreme environment, these drawbacks probably won't matter. For more modern designs, it's important to at least consider alternatives to FR4. Before you start designing around an alternate PCB substrate material, talk to some fabricators to see what materials they can work with in their process, and to see what layer thicknesses they recommend in their stackups. They'll send you back a PCB stackup table like that shown in the image below.
Given the thermal demands in modern PCBs that operate at high speed and/or high frequency, and given the harsh environments in which these systems are being deployed, it might make sense to use a different material for your next PCB. You've got a few options for substrate materials, or some alternative design choices to try and deal with high heat in some applications.
Using a board with higher thermal conductivity allows heat to easily spread throughout the board, allowing your board to operate at a more uniform temperature. FR4 boards with high speed/high frequency devices can develop hot spots around the larger high speed processors (e.g., FPGAs or MPUs). The overall thermal conductivity of the board can be increased by using some alternative material or using additional plane layers. In these boards, you should be using heat sinks on important components anyways, or possibly a fan for some airflow. Another option is to use a thermal interface material to bond the board to its enclosure, giving a path for heat directly back to the enclosure.
In this section, I want to present some alternative options that some designers may not have considered. These alternative materials target a specific drawback seen in FR4 substrates. It's important to note that there is no single alternative PCB substrate material that overcomes every drawback of FR4 laminates. Instead, you need to pick the specific drawback that matters for your system. Some examples are found in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermal management in FR4 boards can be complemented by using a metal core or metal-backed board. The large slab of aluminum used in these boards nicely allows heat to be dissipated throughout the board and into an enclosure or housing, ensuring a more even temperature distribution. This is useful in a number of applications, such as boards for LED lighting or high power regulators in unique environments.
Alternative materials for multilayer PCB substrates provide other advantages besides thermal management. As an example, the manufacturing process for ceramic PCBs allows passive components to be embedded in the inner layers of a multilayer ceramic PCB. The mixture of materials required to create a ceramic board allows their mechanical properties to be tuned while maintaining a high ratio of thermal to electrical conductivity. The thermal expansion coefficient of ceramics for PCBs is closer to that of most conductors, which reduces mechanical stress during cycling.
One popular alternative group of materials, especially in Asia, is composite epoxy materials (CEM), specifically CEM-3. This class of composite materials is made from woven glass fabric surfaces and a non-woven glass core combined with an epoxy synthetic resin. Some manufacturers advocate that CEM-3 should completely replace FR4 as it is cheaper to produce, provides the same level of flame retardance, and is usable with the same manufacturing processes as FR4.
The glass transition temperature of CEM-3 (approximately 125 °C) is similar to that of FR4 (approximately 135 °C). Other CEM-based materials, for example CEM-1 and CEM-2, have much lower glass transition temperatures and should not be used with multilayer boards. Most manufacturers will only recommend using CEM-3 for low layer counts, although it is being used to replace FR4 boards with a similar number of layer counts.
A PCB laminate material that is classified as "high frequency" could refer to its usefulness in two important areas:
Materials that satisfy both criteria are often used in applications like radar modules operating at 24 GHz (short range), 76-77 GHz (long range), or 77-81 GHz (short range). Other specialty applications are imaging radar, drone radar, wireless MANs, remote sensing, SATCOM, remote sensing, and much more. In the digital realm, alternative PCB substrate materials for high frequencies are needed to allow for very long channel lengths, such as in backplanes or server motherboards. For example, large 3U/6U backplanes can have high-speed channel lengths reaching 20 inches with bandwidths reaching beyond radar frequencies. If we designed this board on FR4, you'd never recover the signal from a channel that long.
Probably the two most popular high frequency PCB substrate materials are PTFE-based laminates (Teflon) with microglass filler (e.g., Rogers) and Megtron. In devices that will operate at high frequency, using one of these high frequency PCB laminate materials may be the best choice if your routing channels will be very long. In short channels, return loss will be the dominant loss mechanism
High speed/high frequency laminates are often used in the outer layer of high speed/high frequency PCBs in order to reduce signal attenuation. PTFE-based laminates are normally placed on top of an inner core in high speed devices, naturally allowing it to be used with multilayer PCBs. Compared to FR4, Teflon is recommended for GHz and higher frequencies and data transfer rates due to its much lower dispersion and lower dielectric constant, leading to a faster signal propagation speed at these high speeds.
PTFE provides other advantages as well. It is a poor absorber of water, so it is useful in humid or wet environments. It can be used as a surface-layer or interior laminate layer with a number of materials, thus it can be used to form a low loss layer specifically for high speed/high frequency signals. However, it is more expensive than FR4 and is more challenging to work with in stackup construction as it requires pressing at ~370 °C. It also has lower thermal conductivity than FR4, so thermal management in PTFE boards is important.
There are a variety of other materials that can be used for high speed, high temperature, and HDI multilayer boards. Standard material sets falling into the domain of FR4 or PTFE-based materials can only be made to some minimum thickness and must be mechanically drilled. These materials can be used in HDI PCBs with mechanically drilled blind/buried vias, but they may not be usable with microvias. Alternative materials are needed for HDI PCBs and more advanced UHDI PCBs/IC substrates; these alternatives must be compatible with etching or additive deposition, and laser drilling.
Prepregs and cores that are to be used in HDI designs with microvias must be compatible with laser drilling. The resin mix, glass weave style, and layer thickness of these materials are all formulated for the laser drilling process. This enables fabrication small diameter vias (<6 mil diameter), and given the allowed aspect ratio limits for these structures, a thin dielectric layer is required. Materials manufacturers will market their materials specifically for use in laser-drilling processes if the materials are compatible.
Laser-drillable laminates encompass a range of commercially available brands and material formulations, some of which are specified in slash sheets and are compliant with IPC standards. They include glass-reinforced resin materials which fit within the definition of FR4, and these materials are available from many popular manufacturers (e.g., Isola and ITEQ). There are other materials that are laser-drillable but do not fall within the definition of FR4:
Some of these materials are useful in both PCBs and high-density substrates for semiconductor chips or chiplets. For example, RCC is a common option for use in both areas as a material system for high-density builds involving multiple sub-laminations.
The term "build-up film" is sometimes used in place laser-drillable laminate that would be found in HDI PCB. These films are packaged as film rolls which are then laminated onto the base PCB materials. The most common buildup film is Ajinomoto Buildup Film (ABF), although its most common use is in semiconductor substrate production rather than as a PCB material. Currently, ABF dominates the supply chain for semiconductor IC substrates, but it can be used in HDI/UHDI PCBs. ABF also has reasonably low dielectric constant (down to Dk = 3.3) and lower losses than FR4, which makes it useful for ASICs or processors requiring high-bandwidth channels. A very close substitute for lower density (subtractive etching) designs is RCC, which uses organic resins coated with copper foil.
Dielectric constant (Dk) |
Smallest value = 3.3 |
Loss tangent (Df) |
Smallest value = 0.01 |
Glass transition temperature (Tg) |
165 to 198 °C |
Z-axis CTE |
Smallest value = 20 ppm/°C |
This film can be build on an FR4 core, BT epoxy core, thermoset resin core, or other rigid organic cores. This follows the standard HDI stackup construction with stacked blind/buried vias (type II), but scaled to higher densities and often fabricated with an additive process.
As more advanced chips demand ultra-thin, low-Dk buildup film options for UHDI PCBs and semiconductor packaging, expect ABF to see greater usage inside and outside the semiconductor industry. However, due to ABF's market dominance in build-up films, innovative companies are searching for the buildup film of the future. These FR4 alternatives for outer layer processing are also intended to have Dk < 3 in order to support high-bandwidth channels in HDI, UHDI, and packaging. As these newer materials are hit the market, you can start working with them in your layout and stackup if you're using the right PCB design software.
No matter which alternative materials for PCB substrate material you use in your next multilayer board, you need the right design software to create your PCB stackup and your physical layout. Altium Designer® was created with the tools that allow you to build advanced PCBs for any application. The stackup materials compiles relevant electrical and mechanical specifications for a broad range of materials, and this tool interfaces directly with your design, simulation, and documentation features in a unified design environment.
Download a free trial of Altium today to learn more about the board design features and the design environment. You’ll also have access to the industry’s best design features in a single program. Talk to an Altium expert today to learn more.