The Basics of PDN for the PCB Designer
When PCB designers hear the term “PDN”, or “Power Distribution Network”, it might conjure up notions of bode plots, black magic, and other mysterious, scary things. In reality, the goal of the PDN is as straightforward as are most of the PCB design aspects that aﬀect PDN performance. In this paper we’ll explain the various aspects of most PDN designs and how the PCB design software can inﬂuence them.
TOPICS IN THIS SOLUTION
The fundamental goal of a Power Distribution Network is very straightforward - provide enough current and voltage to every load in order to meet their operation requirements. While the overall design of a PDN, including voltage regulators, on- die decoupling, packaging, mounting of components, etc., is a very challenging science that requires specialized training and experience, optimizing a PCB for PDN performance is less complicated since a PCB designer is limited in what they can do. In this paper, we’ll focus on what to consider within the PCB layout to ensure that your PCB design will provide suﬃcient current and voltage to all of your loads.
Ensuring there’s enough metal (usually copper) between each of the sources and their corresponding loads is the most critical aspect of PDN design. On the bright side, for a nominal cost, IPC-2152 provides fairly straightforward guidelines on how to do this. Given the maximum expected current and allowed temperature rise, the speciﬁcation tells you what the minimum width should be for your power shape. Unfortunately, a designer only using IPC-2152 will be over-designing their PCB design software while being unaware of problems in their design, which comes with several limitations including:
- IPC-2152 width recommendations are very conservative. They represent calculations using data from a thermal worst-case scenario (2-layer board with no adjacent copper) and users typically make the most conservative assumptions (e.g., minimum allowed temperature rise). Designs made using only IPC-2152 may have much larger power shapes than necessary.
- IPC-2152 via recommendations are conservative. This is especially problematic since vias for one power rail might perforate the power shapes above and below, therefore via numbers and sizes should be optimized. Designs made using only IPC-2152 may have larger or more power vias than necessary.
Conservative Copper Pour
- IPC-2152 only applies to the most straightforward design. A consistent width from source to load without any perforations from vias or constrictions from components and other shapes. IPC-2152 doesn’t give guidance on how to address imperfections in a design’s power shapes.
- IPC-2152 gives no insight into placement of associated power rails. Voltage regulators often have speciﬁc requirements for the various power shapes associated with them, from input to output, possibly including feedback.
Designers need better tools for optimizing the size and shape of their power (and ground) rails, commonly referred to as “PI-DC” or “IR Drop”. Altium has integrated this capability into their design environment with PDN Analyzer to make it as easy as possible to meet PDN requirements. Rather than relying on IPC-2152, a designer can analyze each power rail to see how much metal is appropriate, including aspects that IPC-2152 doesn’t address such as:
- Distance between the source and loads
- Allowed voltage drop between the source and loads
- Allowed current through connector pins
- Compensating for perforations or constrictions in the ground plane from vias, connectors, etc.
- Parts of the power or ground shapes that carry no current, making them candidates for - potential issues such as EMI failures and excessive crosstalk
- Eﬃciency of power and ground shapes
PDN Analyzer allows the designer to quickly and easily meet the most fundamental aspect of PDN design - optimizing the design of the metal between the sources and loads.
Design with Copper Peninsula and Islands in Blue
The next aspect of the design under the PCB editor control is capacitor optimization. At ﬁrst glance this might be intimidating since it involves frequency-dependent characteristics, which are much less intuitive than the PI-DC aspect. Fortunately, the complexity is limited by the number of parameters aﬀecting capacitor eﬃciency that a PCB designer schematic can inﬂuence, including:
- Capacitor selection (sizes, values, and numbers)
- Capacitor placement
- Layer stackup
The last two are facets that the custom PCB designer can inﬂuence most and their optimization calls for observing speciﬁc guidelines, including (Bogatin, 2011):
- Spreading capacitors around the package of the load
- Close placement of capacitors
- Placing the power and ground planes of the power rail as close to the surface of the board as possible
- Using the thinnest dielectric possible between the power and ground planes
- Alternating the polarity of capacitor vias when they are in close proximity
Capacitor Placement Around Load Package
There are also free tools available to aid the designer with capacitor optimization, including Rolf Ostergaard (www.pdntool.com) and Altera (as their “PDN tool”).
There are more highly sophisticated power delivery systems, such as motor controllers with additional requirements like inductors, feedback loops, etc., that we won’t cover here. In these cases, more complex analysis tools and/or guidelines than most PCB designers have access to will be necessary.
Current Density Plot on Complex Rigid-Flex Design
Design of a system-wide PDN solution meeting each source and load’s abilities and requirements is a very sophisticated science. But PDN Analyzer allows the PCB designing software to easily optimize power and ground shapes to use the least amount of real estate and components while increasing the reliability of a design.
Current Density Plot on Rigid-Flex Design