From Mechanical Drilling to Laser Drilling of PCB Microvias

Zachariah Peterson
|  Created: December 20, 2018  |  Updated: September 25, 2020
From Mechanical Drilling to Laser Drilling of Microvias

 

PCB via fabrication relies on a specialized process of drilling and plating, where the drilling step is executed in two possible ways: mechanical drilling and laser drilling. Mechanical drilling is the practice used for standard PCBs where the hole sizes are not too small. HDI (High-Density Interconnect) design practices can be used for mechanical drilling, but only down to a certain limit. Eventually, laser drilling will be needed to fabricate a PCB, which is determined by the diameter of the holes that need to be drilled and the thickness of the layer where holes are being placed.

It is the designer's responsibility to understand the limits of mechanical drilling and laser drilling. If laser drill hole sizes are specified in a laminate thickness or material type that cannot be laser drilled, you will be forced to make changes to the PCB design in order to proceed to production.

If you want to avoid the need to make changes to your design before manufacturing, pay attention to the mechanical drilling and laser drilling limits defined in this article.

PCB Drilling Limits

As drilled holes get smaller in a PCB, they run up against certain fabrication limits, which should be considered in the design. In general, drill size limits will be selected based on the following factors:

  • Total board thickness for through-hole vias
  • Layer or lamination thickness for blind/buried vias
  • Fabrication process being used
  • Desired landing pad size and annular ring requirement
  • Manufacturer's capability limits

Keep these points in mind as we look at the typical size restrictions on drills.

Through-Hole Mechanical Drilling Limits

Mechanical drilling is primarily limited by available drill sizes; you can only drill so small before you have to switch to laser drilling. The mechanically drilled hole diameter and the board thickness define an aspect ratio limit for a particular drill size. Your aspect ratio needs to stay below a certain value for a given hole diameter, and this will limit the total board thickness.

What are the exact aspect ratio limits? This depends on the limits set by your fabrication house. They can only guarantee accurate hole size and positional tolerance for certain maximum aspect ratio values. An example for a few drill diameters is shown in the following table.

Aspect ratio

Typical values:

  • 10 mil drill: AR < 12:1
  • 8 mil drill: AR < 10:1
  • 6 mil drill: AR < 8:1

Drilled hole diameter

6 mil minimum

Positional tolerance

Based on IPC Producibility Level

Pad size

Based on IPC annular ring/product class

Table 1: Typical mechanical drilling limits for vias

Different PCB fabrication houses may have different aspect ratio limits, so check with them before creating your design. If you do not check with them first, you risk being given holes that are too small, and once the design is corrected with a larger hole, there may be clearance problems that need to be resolved.

Laser Drilled Microvia Limits

Laser drilling allows for very fast throughput during manufacturing, but it has limited drilling depth into the PCB material. Due to the limitation on drilling depth, the aspect ratio limitation on laser-drilled microvias will be much lower. Typical values you might find in a standard microvia laser drilling process are shown in the following table.

Aspect ratio

Typical values:

  • AR < 1:1

Drilled hole diameter

2-3 mil minimum

Positional tolerance

Based on IPC Producibility Level

Pad size

Based on IPC annular ring/product class

Table 2: Typical laser drilling limits for microvias

Laser-drilled microvias with an aspect ratio less than one generally require very thin dielectric layers. However, larger microvias can also be fabricated, though they won’t really be classified as microvias despite the fact that they are laser-drilled. For example, the 10 mil maximum laser drill hole diameter limit with a 0.75:1 aspect ratio demands a laminate thickness of 7.5 mils. Typically, if you intend to place drills with this diameter as blind or buried vias, you would use mechanical drilling, which I detail more in the next section.

An important point regarding the fabrication of laser-drilled microvias is that the pre-preg material being used must be laser-drillable. Not all PCB laminate materials are marketed as laser-drillable, although the growth in HDI markets has greatly expanded the range of compatible materials.

When viewed under the microscope, laser-drillable materials that can be used as HDI buildup layers in sequential lamination are not much different from standard materials in terms of structure. You still have the same glass weave styles and similar resin material systems.

The materials shown above are standard FR4-grade laminates, but many other materials are available for use in these designs as HDI buildup layers. To learn more, read this excellent article about HDI materials by Happy Holden.

Mechanically Drilled Blind and Buried Vias

Blind and buried vias can also be mechanically drilled. For example, consider Type 2 and Type 3 HDI stack-ups: these use a buried via in the central core, and the HDI buildup layers are placed around the core using sequential lamination. The central core via typically has to pass through a thicker core layer stack, thus the aspect ratio will demand mechanical drilling. Examples of these two types of HDI stack-ups are shown below.

What are the drilling limits in this case? Typically, because this is placed as a mechanically drilled via, it will first obey the drill bit sizing limit, which means the smallest drilled hole size would be 6 mils. Next, there may be an aspect ratio limit that must be obeyed based on your manufacturer's capabilities, just as I outlined above. This should also be investigated if you are considering a Type 2 or Type 3 HDI stack-up.

Don't Forget About IC Substrates

The rules discussed here apply to HDI PCB stack-ups, which drive layer thickness limits in the design. However, the same applies to IC substrate fabrication, especially when you consider that standard substrate structures are very similar to HDI PCB stack-ups. For example, consider the common substrate construction with BT epoxy for the core and ABF for the HDI layers.

We also have a coreless substrate option, which looks a lot like HDI PCBs.

The differences between IC substrates and HDI PCBs come from the materials used to build the substrate. Organic materials, such as those shown in the above images, are used to build many substrates, and the processing limitations can be expected to be very similar. This includes substrates made with very thin FR4-grade materials. However, unique package structures are active topics of research, and the industry moves very quickly in this regard. Just as is the case with PCBs, IC substrates also demand close collaboration with your fabrication house to ensure you get the design rules locked in before beginning the design.

Whether you need to build reliable power electronics or advanced digital systems, use the complete set of PCB design features and world-class CAD tools in Altium Designer®. To implement collaboration in today’s cross-disciplinary environment, innovative companies are using the Altium 365 platform to easily share design data and put projects into manufacturing.

We have only scratched the surface of what’s possible with Altium Designer on Altium 365. Start your free trial of Altium Designer + Altium 365 today.

About Author

About Author

Zachariah Peterson has an extensive technical background in academia and industry. He currently provides research, design, and marketing services to companies in the electronics industry. Prior to working in the PCB industry, he taught at Portland State University and conducted research on random laser theory, materials, and stability. His background in scientific research spans topics in nanoparticle lasers, electronic and optoelectronic semiconductor devices, environmental sensors, and stochastics. His work has been published in over a dozen peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings, and he has written 2500+ technical articles on PCB design for a number of companies. He is a member of IEEE Photonics Society, IEEE Electronics Packaging Society, American Physical Society, and the Printed Circuit Engineering Association (PCEA). He previously served as a voting member on the INCITS Quantum Computing Technical Advisory Committee working on technical standards for quantum electronics, and he currently serves on the IEEE P3186 Working Group focused on Port Interface Representing Photonic Signals Using SPICE-class Circuit Simulators.

Related Resources

Related Technical Documentation

Back to Home
Thank you, you are now subscribed to updates.